Melinda Tankard Reist is a writer, speaker and co-founder of Collective Shout. She co-edited Big Porn Inc:
This article first appeared in Christian Research Journal, volume 27, number 03 For further information or to subscribe to the Christian Research Journal go to: What appears to be a secular problem, however, is also prevalent among Christians.
Because pornography has seduced a large number of Christians, it has impacted the church in three destructive ways: But if thine eye be evil, thy whole body shall be full of darkness. If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness! I was a year-old former minister at the time, well on my way toward a fully backslidden state, and I was considering whether to indulge in the many sexual sins that I had, at that point, only allowed myself to imagine.
One glance around that roomful of graphic sexual images sent a rush through my system very much like a narcotic Pornography and ethics. The longer I gazed, the more intoxicated I became, and over the next few hours the porn brought me temporary escape and exhilaration.
The darker aspects of this newfound magic soon became clear to me. I revisited the same porn shop nightly for the next two weeks. I then spiraled into the use of prostitutes, an affair with a married woman, homosexuality, and a five-year habit of reckless, degrading sexual practices.
It began with the use of pornography, a product I continued to consume during my backslidden years, and which I have come to regard much the way an addict regards a drug — a destructive vice I have to strenuously avoid, always remembering its lethal impact on my life.
Through cable, videotape and DVD products, and the Internet, virtually anyone wanting to view porn is able to do so with minimal effort.
During the single month of January What, at first glance, appears to be a secular problem is, in fact, a problem more commonly found among Christians than any of us would care to admit. The legal definition of obscenity, however, as established by the U.
Supreme Court innarrows the term: While applying contemporary community standards and taken as a whole, it is something that the average person would consider appeals to prurient interest. The work or material depicts or describes sexual conduct in a patently offensive way as specifically defined by the applicable state law.
The work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, and scientific value.
Honesty and common sense will also allow that any visual material used to incite an erotic response, even if the material is not generally considered obscene, becomes a form of pornography to the individual who uses it to that end.
First, it creates a dependency on pornography that weakens the individual believer.
|Scrub Notes: A Blog For Med Students: Dale Dubin: Pornography and Prison||By Sharlyn Lauby|
|Pornography and Ethics Many women engage in viewing different forms of pornography for sexual arousal or for mere interest. It is an interesting phenomenon in our society, while it is also a very controversial issue.|
|Things that were manually required and a wide variety of entertainment have all become accessible features with the click of a button. In majority, internet has facilitated the growth of pornography through free websites that pornography used as a widespread business strategy.|
|PORNOGRAPHY AND ETHICS||It is an interesting phenomenon in our society, while it is also a very controversial issue.|
The Judeo-Christian ethic places a high premium on personal freedom and condemns anything that restricts or prohibits a person from reaching his or her God-given potential.
If liberty is good, it stands to reason that addiction — a dependence on a certain behavior or experience — is bad; and if something can be shown to be addictive, that in itself becomes a strong argument against it.
There are limits to this argument, to be sure. Most would agree that caffeine is an addictive substance, and yet coffee drinking is generally not frowned on; nor is the use of sugar, which many consider a relatively addictive substance. A woman who drinks three cups of coffee daily, for example, is different than a woman with a thousand-dollar-a-day heroin habit.
Both of them may be, in the strictest sense, dependent on their drug of choice, and so their freedom is impaired. The coffee drinker is not, however, in virtually all cases, significantly and functionally impaired by her drug.
She can operate on the job, maintain focus and stability, and manage personal responsibilities quite well despite her habit.
The heroin user, in contrast, is rendered largely dysfunctional by her drug, will often resort to illegal activities to support her use of it, and is affected by heroin in such a way that it becomes increasingly difficult for her to sustain even the most primary human relationships.
Peter described the false promise of freedom through immorality: Bondage to a sexual sin — a growing dependency on the sin, similar to dependency on a drug — often goes unrecognized because addiction to a behavior is a relatively new concept to many people.INTRODUCTION.
Although I have a deep personal and professional interest in the Internet, I had never really thought of the Internet as an ethical issue until I was first contacted – by e-mail, of course – by Professor Marc Le Menestrel.
PORNOGRAPHY THE ETHICS AND ISSUES BEHIND IT ALL SHAWN PIERCE SOC: INSTRUCTOR MARKER OCTOBER 14th, PORNGRAPHY: THE ETHICS AND ISSUES BEHIND IT ALL Over the period of many years, the consumption of pornography has massively expanded, causing it to have presently created itself a position in culture.
The purpose of this guide is to identify security and ethical issues surrounding the use of the Internet today. Case Studies as Ethics Training ToolsMankind censure injustice fearing that they may be the victim of it, and not because they shrink from. Mar 17, · Mashable is a global, multi-platform media and entertainment company.
Powered by its own proprietary technology, Mashable is the go-to source for tech, digital culture and entertainment content.
Illegal use of minor in nudity-oriented material or performance. No person shall do any of the following: Photograph any minor who is not the person's child or ward in a state of nudity, or create, direct, produce, or transfer any material or performance that shows the minor in a state of nudity, unless both of the following apply.